Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML Permathread, iteration N+1 - was Re: [xml-dev] Python and JSON vs XML???

From
Nathan Young <>
To
Peter Hunsberger <>, Rich Salz <>
Date
2005-08-26T21:10:28Z
ID
<op.sv4vrqaftk791m@mailman>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML Permathread, iteration N+1 - was Re: [xml-dev] Python and JSON vs XML???
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:07:31 -0700, Peter Hunsberger  
<> wrote:

> On 8/26/05, Rich Salz <> wrote:
>> > the major use cases?  I'm keeping an open mind on that, but I fear
>> > that many major stakeholders want a different 20%.
>>
>> Which, according to conventional wisdom, is how/why XSD is what it is.
>> And there seems to be consensus to "do better."  Yet, as Liam observed
>> at the members meeting back in February, who else should do this but  
>> W3C?
>>
>> It's going to be very hard.  Irresistable forces create intractable
>> standards. :)
>>
>
> If only we had an immovable object or two for these forces to run  
> into....

Intractable standards = immovable forces???



-- 


.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:.

Nathan Young
A: ncy1717
E: 
Next in thread → Next in month →