← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ?

From
Dan Vint <>
To
Michael Rys <>, "Costello, Roger L." <>, XML Developers List <>
Date
2005-09-29T20:30:42Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ?
At 12:49 PM 9/29/2005, Michael Rys wrote:
>In general the problem you are looking at is the general data modeling 
>question: How close does your logical design (the XML structure in your 
>store) be coupled with your conceptual design (the XML structure as seen 
>by the consumer of the data). Many of the comments you make below are 
>appropriate and are closely related to the questions of relational data vs 
>XML data and relational normalizations vs denormalizations.

I'd take this a little further to say, "What is the purpose of the XML 
being designed?". It is implied in the description of moving a picker that 
I'm removing an old entry and creating a new one. Is my XML supposed to be 
the data base or is a report of the current status of pickers. As a report, 
all the work is done in the application and just output. If my XML is the 
database and it drives the associated applications, then I might do 
something different.

..dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny Vint

Specializing in Panoramic Images of California and the West
http://www.dvint.com

voice: 510-522-4703
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →