On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:08:18AM -0800, Michael Champion wrote:
> At the risk of drawing flames ... arguably the EXI WG really should
> have been an XG. The (internal W3C discussion) pushback on that
> suggestion was that the research is done and now its time to
> standardize. We shall see of course.
The Binary Characterization WG probably would have been am XG if
the process had been ready.
Liam
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://fromoldbooks.org/
