>[ ...] in our case, we
> are targeting any MusicXML application that cares about this particular
> feature. Should we just use the name of the feature instead? If we do that,
> then matching the target name will convey all the necessary information, and
> there will be no extra PI data required.
I'd vote no; use a generic app name and add extra PI data. That way,
if you come across yet another need for such a thing in 3 more weeks
(or whatever) you won't have to add another PI...
--
Peter Hunsberger
