Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I agree with Pete. As soon as you introduce a new syntax, most of the
> reasons for ubiquitous XML adoption evaporate. I assume you want to
> 'improve XML' and not nest another product inside it. Attempts to do
> the latter have failed spectacularly.
>
So have attempts to do the former. (Namespaces, XML 1.1, Schemas...) :-)
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
