Melvin Chin wrote:
> May I seek some opinions on this topic/proposal?
>
> ===================================================================
> To extend XML spec just a little to permit use of "</>" (GXTC)
> to be placed wherever it is permitted in the current XML spec
> to place a closing tag. The semantics will be to effect a
> closing of the nearest open tag before the position of GXTC.
> ===================================================================
>
> Any opinion is fine, useful, crazy, nonsense, should be done,
> must not coz it's going to break many things ...
>
> I could see some good use of it, but do note the deep potential
> impact it may bring. Would like to hear from you.
>
> Thanks.
>
> cheers,
> mc
>
my 1€ :
<a>b<c>d<e>f</e></c></a>
<a>b<c>d<e>f</></></>
<a>b<c>d<e>f</3>
a little more shorter !
we could also reduce to <3> but it really looks like an open tag
<a>b<c>d<e>f<3>
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
