Michael Kay wrote:
> These are not points of view and I don't have an opinion. They are factual
> statements which are either true or false, and can be verified by reference
> to the specification, which is what has been happening over the last few
> days.
>
> There's no point in using secondary sources for such questions: you should
> always go straight to the definitive spec.
>
> Michael Kay
>
>
Very true. However I'm continually amazed by the number of people who
would never dream of reading the original spec, but rather totally
depend on secondary sources. There seems to be a widespread belief that
only guru's gurus can directly interpret the exalted texts.
Frank
