Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)

I wrote:
> (a and b) or c
>
> could be designed as:
>
> <or>
>     <a>
>     <and>
>         <b/>
>         <c/>
>     </and>
> </or>

...or more correctly:

<or>
  <and>
    <a/>
    <b/>
  </and>
  <c/>
</or>

:)