> Well... we don't really need to rehash the whole
> who-do-we-thank-for-word processors / spreadsheets thing. I used
> WordStar in 1982, WordPerfect later, Visicalc in DOS, etc. There are
> only so many ways (so far) to do a word processor or a spreadsheet, and
> the only real innovation that stands out was the original Visicalc.
>
> Microsoft has been paid more than enough for Office and Windows.
According to who? You? And what gives you this right?
> but that doesn't invalidate my
> recognizing it for what it is.
A clone of someone else's hard work. Dress it up all you want, but spare me
the bullshit.
