As you say 'dreaded'. Why would anyone in their right mind use this mechanism ?
Fraser.
2008/4/25 Andrew Welch <>:
> On 25/04/2008, Dave Pawson <> wrote:
> > > NVDL is focused on allowing extensibility of the XML, but at the end
> > > of an NVDL validation the XML instance is valid and unchanged.
> > >
> >
> > Would you expect any xml instance to be changed by a validation process?
>
> No but there are the dreaded defaulted values in DTDs and XML
> Schema... and perhaps you could say the PSVI is a modified input - but
> at least that can't break your processing... (although I'm not 100% on
> that... maybe there are a few gotchas there?)
>
>
> --
> Andrew Welch
> http://andrewjwelch.com
> Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
