Michael Kay wrote:
> There aren't two languages for defining integrity constraints in SQL
> databases, or for defining assertions in Java; why should there be two for
> defining validation constraints in XML documents? The scope is sufficiently
> narrow that one language ought to be enough.
Hmm... I don't think I'd ever call the scope of anything in XML
"narrow", even from a strictly programming perspective.
I marvel at the infinite number of ways people have found to use XML,
and their ever-changing expectations for how to process it.
Variety is a good thing here.
Thanks,
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/
