Re: [xml-dev] Convention versus standard

From
Rick Marshall <>
To
Michael Kay <>
Date
2008-07-22T00:23:01Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Convention versus standard
You had to be there. Some of were still concerned about how to specify 
what switches to depress to load a binary value into an address or 
register when these things were designed.

So to take it one step further - what do the "modern" xml things do when 
trying to interpret my example.

I know that libxml2 tries to treat it as octal - and that causes me 
grief. What does Saxon do? Do we have a list of behaviors for xml/xsl 
interpreters?

This would make a good addition to Roger's lists of real life conventions.

Regards
Rick

Michael Kay wrote:
>> Wow, are people still using languages where that applies? 
>>     
>
> Blushing with embarassment, I see that this is true of Java! Amazing that
> anyone should dream up such a convention, let alone reproduce it in a modern
> programming language.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: 
> subscribe: 
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>