Philippe Poulard a écrit :
> Mukul Gandhi a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>> I wrote the following blog post. This is perhaps a weird thought,
>> for people having worked with XML for long.
>>
>> http://mukulgandhi.blogspot.com/2008/09/should-we-include-version10-in-xpath.html
>>
>>
>> This is a short description of the points I have in mind.
>>
>> Could you please let us know, if my logic have any merit.
>>
>
> Perhaps exposed as attributes ?
>
> /@version
> /@standalone
> /@encoding
>
> This would have the advantage to keep as-is the XML syntax
Error: I was talking about the XPath syntax, of course :)
The 3 expressions above are syntaxically correct
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
