On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Simon St.Laurent <> wrote:
> Andrew Welch wrote:
.....................................................
>> Something to consider is Scala, which contains an xml type:
>>
>> http://www.scala-lang.org/node/131
>>
>> ...so you have both a general purpose language with an inbuilt xml
>> processing ability.
>
> That strikes me as an interesting and likely path forward. Instead of
> bolt-on APIs, language developers can integrate XML-specific functionality
> with their environments.
>
Of course. LINQ has been there for 3 years now.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
