* Mukul Gandhi wrote:
>These productions imply that doctypedecl is optional. So, shouldn't
>the above XML be a legal XML? Can somebody please point to the
>relevant section of the XML spec, where the above XML proves to be
>illegal.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#wf-entdeclared
>Can I anyhow successfully parse the above XML? for e.g., using a
>custom entity resolver, or using a catalog file.
You could make the document "XML" by adding a proper document type
declaration, and then parse it as usual, for instance.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto: · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
