RE: [xml-dev] M as the next XML?

From
Len Bullard <>
To
'Richard Salz' <>,
Date
2009-03-26T21:13:05Z
ID
<E68276E6837A4E44B1BC99272FEEC951@gigapartspc>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] M as the next XML?
Revenge of the curly.  { and ; kick < and "'s butt.

More basic data types coupled a little more strongly to the syntax to
achieve a smarter pipeline.

Rick Jeliffe is right.  

len


From: Richard Salz [mailto:] 

Any comments on this blog entry?
        http://blog.jclark.com/2009/03/getting-involved-with-m.html