> Alan Danziger wrote:
>
> > Passive documents specify information but do not specify in-band or
> > out-of-band anything about how that information should be used.
>
> > Active documents contains in-band or out-of-band processing
> rules for
> > its use.
>
> Ah ha!
>
> So there are discernable differences in XML documents.
No, that doesn't follow. If the information is out-of-band, then it's not
discernable and is not a difference in the document, it's a difference in
the way it is used.
>
> Assertion: declarativity is a quality that is good and
> desirable and should be maximized.
>
> Assertion: passivity is a quality that is good and desirable
> and should be maximized.
>
> Assertion: by measuring its declarativity and passivity we
> can assess the goodness of an XML document.
>
> Assertion: the goodness of an XML document is a function of
> its declarativity and passivity.
>
I think you're completely off target here. It all depends what the document
is for. If you're trying to say that a document containing an instruction to
move $1000 from account A to account B is bad because it's active and
procedural, then I would say that's nonsense. Or at any rate, I would say
"why is it bad?".
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
