Dan Brickley wrote:
> You write "Typically, Working Groups are rechartered if there is
> active interest in their work and they are close to their goal, as the
> XHTML Working Group is. Another year of effort would probably be
> sufficient to finish the XHTML specifications."
>
> Although not as high-profile as a REC-track group, there is nothing to
> stop a group of like-minded W3C members single-handedly chartering an
> Incubator Group (XG, see http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ ) to try to
> progress the XHTML efforts. Perhaps - in part - by defining a recovery
> model for ill-formed XML markup?
But it looks like XHTML5 is slated to replace it.
Can we count on XHTML5 to meet all the requirements of XHTML?
Jonathan
