> Although they could not actually point to an actual current case where
> using XTHML syntax breaks things,
it does break things, spectacularly badly in some cases.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2009Oct/0080.html
for an analysis of why using xml syntax served as text/xml so badly
mangled
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2009Oct/0080.html
Any XDM serialser should work, it may be directly accessible from an api
but if nt, just this xslt stylesheet
<xsl:styleseet vesion=...>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:styleshet>
assuming the elements are in no namespace, or add a simple template
matching * to take things out of a namespace if they are in the xhtml
namespace.
>They also requested that if I use a tag that takes bodies but the body
>is empty to not write it as <tag/>
>Example
> <P/> should be written as <P></P> .... although I think I can
>waffle on this one.
That's the one that is perhaps most important to fix, if you use
/> syntax with things served as text/html then things will go wrong.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
