On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:32:37PM -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
> The textual flaw isn't that [the XML Specification] doesn't mention XSD or
> RNG, the textual flaw is that it mentions *any* schema language.
Agreed.
But the fairy dust has scattered, the hype has moved on, and few
organizations today would want to pay money to participate in
XML 2.0 work, I fear, even if we could get consensus on what such
a beast should look like.
Liam
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
