Olivier Rossel wrote:
> You mean a switch from "RDBMS with XML features" to "pure XML
> databases", I presume.
> Right?
Sure. Companies that have made that switch are appropriate for my list.
David Lee wrote:
> Also are you interested in companies that have adopted "pure XML
> Databases" or only ones that have done so AND entirely tossed any
> Relational databases.
Companies that by-passed RDBMS and went straight to XML database would be appropriate for my list.
Michael Kay wrote:
> People don't "switch" from one technology to another. They adopt a new
> technology alongside the old, and they coexist for decades, running
> different applications.
>
> Most of the applications that I have seen using XML databases would never
> have been implemented in an RDBMS. They might previously have used free text
> databases, document management systems, operating system filestore, in some
> cases object databases.
Do you know of companies that have opted for XML databases instead of free text databases, document management systems, operating systems filestores, or object databases?
/Roger
