On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 18:56 -0400, David wrote:
[...]
> Up until now we've never used namespaces. We've been blissfully
> unaffected by not using namespaces. XQuery and XSLT and pure Java
> programs have had no problem with having no namespaces. The data is
> typically in "silos" and while sometimes referenced together, is not of
> the "module" sort intended to be embedded in other XML documents, but
> rather fully standalone data (which may reference each other with loose
> couplings).
> Any *practical* suggestions ?
The primary reason to use namespaces for XML data is for disambiguation.
A secondary aspect of that is to trigger specific behaviour -- e.g. a
generic XML browser recognising mathml or svg.
If you don't have an ambiguity problem, the complexity of namespaces
is simply unlikely to give you any benefit.
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
