Good idea on picking a name, but alas, from the great discussions this week,
I doubt just picking a name will mean were talking about the same thing.
There seems to my eye more opinions about the intent/goals/meaning for "xxx
XML" then people.
----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
http://www.xmlsh.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:59 AM
To: Pete Cordell
Cc:
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Pete's blend for XMLlite
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:19:58 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <> wrote:
>
> It's at:
>
> http://codalogic.com/xmllite/xmllite.html
Can we get this naming issue out of the way, to reduce confusion?
For my 2 cents worth XML 2.0 is a non-starter, due respect to W3C.
Simple XML,
XMLLite
What else?
Has anyone access to a 'survey' type of site so we can vote on one of
the ones suggested?
At least we could then be sure we're talking about the same thing?
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe:
subscribe:
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
