Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Michael Kay <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes. Exactly.
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji
I don't think it's a case of "running scared". I think it's a case of trying to learn from JSON how much could be achieved with something much simpler than we have today, but without losing the things we really value about XML.
I think we need to focus on the greatest need. I considered responding to the earlier "hysteria" comment by saying that most folks on this thread, and certainly James Clark's post were not "running scared" of JSON. For my part, I embrace it, and I know quite a few others do who still want XML to be simplified.
Yes. Exactly.
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji