On 16/12/2010 23:38, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Also, I believe no IETF or W3C HTML spec that pretends HTML to be an
> application of SGML actually enables the NET-enabled start tags.
>
> Am I mistaken?
No, you are not mistaken, although the parsing of /> in html5 isn't
compatible with html 4 (as specified) either. As you know, it has
(following a general design philosophy) ignored the html4 (and in this
case xml) specifications and instead standardised bug compatible
behaviour with common browsers. Prior to xml no one would have used />
and while it is no doubt true that having got /> into their documents
for one reason or another people have built in assumptions based on the
existiing browser parsing, it is still pretty much a disaster that html5
has _introduced_ this xml based syntax into html but then given it a
different meaning.
David
