Re: [xml-dev] XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)

On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 09:14 +0700, James Clark wrote:
> >
> >
> > (4) the xml variant, <br/>, is based on changing NET to "/>", 
[...]
> 
> This wasn't altogether satisfactory

The final solution was cleaner, yes. I'd forgotten about it.
s/is based/was based/ :-)


>  See
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-sgml-xml-971215

Wow, it's been along time since I saw that!
Thanks for the link - you never know what you'll find in /TR :-)

It reminds me, too, that we never did return to SDATA entities.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org