I found I needed to add a namespace to get 'oXygen' to use
a MicroRNG RelaxNG schema, then it was OK.
So
<grammar xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0">
<start> ...
validated some MicroXML just fine in oXygen 11.2 but only with the
namespace included. It didn't work (v11.2) with just <grammar><start> ...
It was the need for a namespace which caused problems with a
lightweight W3C XML Schema. If MicroXML only includes the xmlns
and treats it as just an attribute and doesn't support prefixes then
I would want to be able to have my MicroXML W3C XML Schema
(subsetted) start with
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">...
but this causes problems with tools which seem to expect
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">...
- presumably something to do with the W3C XML Schema spec?
----
Stephen D Green
----
Stephen D Green
On 24 December 2010 11:02, Dave Pawson <> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:16:05 +0000
> Stephen Green <> wrote:
> So how 'easy' would it be to include this in
>> validating MicroXML parsers (if there ever are such things)? Perhaps
>> easier than having to implement something like XSD which isn't valid
>> as XSD; perhaps less risky anyway.
>
> This is a schema, so I can use it today,
> with nxml-mode/emacs for editing,
> with Jing for validating.
>
> Not sure what more I'd need?
>
>
> --
>
> regards
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
