I admit I'm confused.
What is your objection to xs:boolean type for a Boolean value ?
----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
http://www.xmlsh.org
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:] On Behalf Of John Cowan
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:28 PM
To: Michael Kay
Cc:
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] #Announce published JXML schema, an XML schema for
representing the JSON data model
Michael Kay scripsit:
> Yes, it's possible - you can restrict the lexical space of a simple type
> without restricting its value space by using the pattern facet. But in
> this case, one would have to ask "to what purpose". It's essentially
> just imposing one's personal taste, rather like restricting numbers to
> disallow a leading "+" sign. You can tell when someone is committed to
> standards by the fact that they conform even when it goes against their
> personal taste.
In this case, a new standard is being defined, and it's entirely
appropriate when referring to an existing standard to decide that the
full standard is inappropriate and subset it explicitly.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam.
Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam.
--Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank You
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe:
subscribe:
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
