Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services]

From
Len Bullard <>
To
'Pete Cordell' <>
Date
2011-12-31T20:50:41Z
ID
<0DD226542E164914A3C4B924EBE010D3@LenBullardPro>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services]
Oh most definitely.  One shouldn't confuse tools with artistry unless it is
the artistry of tool making.  The coolness he finds and expresses is
emergent for him and pre-emergent for the artist using the tools he
provides.  To be a little redneck, hang out in Sears and watch the men on
Saturday afternoon gazing at the Craftsmen section.

Saxon is brilliant.

len

> Either way, I think Michael is quite at liberty to call himself an  
> artist, and call what he creates is art.  His art is seen.
>
> Pete Cordell
> Codalogic Ltd
> Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
> data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
> Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
> for more info
Next in thread → Next in month →