Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?

From
John Cowan <>
To
Alex Muir <>
Date
2012-02-05T19:59:41Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
Alex Muir scripsit:

> Probably the only consistent selection across all tools would be for
> CamelCase.. underscore and minus would give different results across
> different tools.

Any tool that purports to support XML as such (as opposed to being a general
text editor) and doesn't know the rules for XML names, is either misconfigured
or buggy.

-- 
Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under
tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous
languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or
obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on
unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness.
                   --Felix Winkelmann