MicroXML and &

Uche's post about MicroXML reminded me...

Did we ever discuss the option of allowing & not followed by #, amp;, lt;, 
gt;, quot; or apos; to be considered simply as an & so you could do AT&T? 
This would make manually writing MicroXML a lot easier!

I guess that would be a breaking change which is why it hasn't been 
considered.  Maybe it can be considered for NanoXML!

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info