Hugh,
> The second may revolve
> around the 2 solutions to Maxwells equations. One solution
> is for an e/m signal going forward in time - but - the other
> is an e/m signal going backward in time (usually ignored by
> physicists).
I'm guessing you're right. I named my son Jacob Maxwell in honour
of his grandad "Jake", and the famous Scottish physicist. And
he was "born awesome", so it's got to be right.
> If you read Gribbins "Schrodinger's Kittens"
> you can see how treating the second solution as "real" leads
> to a more satisfying interpretation to Quantum Mechanics than
> the Copenhagen interpretaton.
>
> Now all that is required is figure out an experiment to
> receive and interpret these backward in time signals. I have
> been pondering this for a while - and it does look impossible
> - yet - maybe if we use entanglement.
Well, I'm guessing you're right! If it made Einstein so upset, he had
to be on the right track. I figure entanglement is what makes us
alive.
:-)
> I once gave a talk to the Ottawa XML Users group called
> Quantum Infodynamics - but it seems to be no longer online.
It was a "light" look at the subject.
Too bad. If they ever put out the version for dummies, let me know.
Cheers,
Peter
