Re: [xml-dev] Re: Topic Maps - current state of the art?

From
John Cowan <>
To
Stephen Cameron <>
Date
2013-10-22T00:45:47Z
ID
<CABzTEQD4G+EREMNa_8-7yVe8BuVF=>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Topic Maps - current state of the art?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Stephen Cameron <[email protected]> wrote:

As I understand it, the HyTime standard not only allowed you to create maps by defining nodes/topics and associations between nodes, but also to go further and map the internal content of occurrences of the nodes/topics as well, something called a 'grove'.

A grove is an abstract data model representing certain parts of a document, the "semantic" parts for whatever the appropriate definition of "semantic" is.  Groves are developed from property sets (which represent *all* the information in a document) using a grove plan.  The XML Infoset is a specific grove, but it's not described by a generic grove plan.

--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures