On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Simon St.Laurent <> wrote:
> On 11/15/13 11:42 AM, David Sheets wrote:
>
>>> After you.
>>
>>
>> This is evasive. You have submitted a claim that this SO issue as an
>> "XML WTF" which is attributable to a type discipline. If you do not
>> defend your claim, we cannot rationally accept it.
>>
>> Further, you made the claim that "XML is not designed for nodes". If
>> you are unwilling to defend this claim, it, too, must be rejected.
>
>
> The history is on Uche's side. If you want to claim that XML has a data
> model, that it was "designed for nodes", you have a lot of revisionism to
> do.
Please direct me to the relevant source that refutes that XML was
"designed for nodes".
>
>> Are you interested in developing actual, useful theories or simply
>> wasting everyone's time?
>
>
> Indeed.
>
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> http://simonstl.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
