On 11/16/13 9:40 AM, David Sheets wrote:
> This does seem to be Uche's original problem. Blaming a type system
> for a silly serialization doesn't actually have any standing.
Thinking of it as "serialization" is at the heart of the conversational
disaster. If you figure out why, then maybe this conversation can
continue more fruitfully.
However....
>> Apparently I have nothing to teach you.
>
> When you refuse to elucidate the very subtle point you are trying to
> make, it is very difficult for people to learn from you.
You seem to expect enlightenment to arrive on your terms and in your
language. In my experience, there is no subtlety to these distinctions
at all. You keep insisting on blurring terms ("nearly zero
distinction"), which makes it pretty much impossible to explain what's
happening.
You also seem to want answers where there are none.
>> Farewell and good luck.
>
> Thanks! I'm quite happy with my present strategy.
Enjoy.
--
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/
