On 2/9/14 2:12 AM, Hans-Juergen Rennau wrote:
> Ihe Onwuka wrote:
> "Stating the obvious here but it needs to be repeated lest we are all
> labelled Perl haters. Markup is not text."
> Rarely have I found a posting so short and so true, or rather: so
> profound. It is a question of perception.
Deepest wrongness may also be profound.
"Markup is not just text" is true. Markup is not text" is short and wrong.
> And 95% of all debate about the "value" of XML is rooted in differences
> of perception. XML may be perceived as text. XML may be perceived as
> markup. XML may be perceived as nodes represented via syntax. XML may be
> perceived as a global forest of nodes (the info space).
> And there are other axes along which to travel: XML may be perceived as
> a means to markup information. XML may be perceived as a means for
> information interchange. XML may be perceived as a representation of
> information. XML may be perceived as information.
> Etc.
None of which even begin to happen without the text foundation. Sorry.
Please come back to earth.
Thanks,
--
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/
