> P.S.: SGML was "too hard", too. The transformation into XML involved shedding features that,
> in retrospect, were solutions to problems that had once been considered compelling.
Yet here we are in 2017, having only SGML to put a check on HTML.
Marcus Reichardt
sgmljs.net/blog.html
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Steve Newcomb <> wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 07:54 PM, Peter Flynn wrote:
>>
>> Given that hardly any automotive documentation is in XML (or even SGML)
>> any more ("too hard"), it's probably moot for this group, unless we want
>> to start a user-supported tractor-documentation project:-
>
>
> I would argue, smilingly, that Peter's "too hard" observation is on-topic.
> Dead center, even. Is XML the future of XML? Such a question can never be
> ruled out-of-order.
>
> If the XML community doesn't choose to respond to change, or even
> acknowledge it, it is moribund. Adapt or die.
>
> Steve
>
> P.S.: SGML was "too hard", too. The transformation into XML involved
> shedding features that, in retrospect, were solutions to problems that had
> once been considered compelling.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
