RE: [xri-editors] Comments on BNF (version 03, lines 649-654)

Of 
course, xri:(@visa).usa/foo.bar is a BAD example... 

 

xri:(http://www.visa.com).usa/foo.bar 
would be better

 

    -Gabe

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Wachob, Gabe 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:42 
  PM
To: ''
Subject: 
  [xri-editors] Comments on BNF (version 03, lines 649-654)

  

  
Drummond-

  
    I noticed that in the xri-authority production, you have URI-authority 
  / XRI-authority / xref

  
 

  
    I'd rather see xref under XRI-authority and then also be able to have a 
  naming authority will a normal dot-path (or colon path I spose). 
  E.g.

  
 

  
xri:(@visa).usa/foo.bar

  
 

  
    So, I guess I'd like to see the following productions 
  as:

  
 

  
authority-part = 
  URI-authority / XRI-authority

  
XRI-authority = 
  (gcs-char / xref) xri-segment

  
 

  
    -Gabe