← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xri] Slate of XRI 2.0 specifications (was Trusted Resolution)

From
Davis, Peter <>
Date
2004-11-16T22:12:25+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xri] Slate of XRI 2.0 specifications (was Trusted Resolution)
i vote for "B"

--- peterd

On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 22:49, Drummond Reed wrote:
> Given that with XRI 2.0 we are going to be publishing several specs,
> it strikes me that this is the time to break out resolution from
> syntax if we are going to do that.
> 
>  
> 
> So the XRI 2.0 family could consist of the one of the following two
> slates of specifications:
> 
>  
> 
> SLATE A:
> 
> 1) XRI Generic Syntax and Resolution
> 
> 2) XRI Trusted Resolution
> 
> 3) XRI Metadata
> 
> 4) XRI Primer
> 
>  
> 
> SLATE B:
> 
> 1) XRI Syntax
> 
> 2) XRI Resolution (includes both generic resolution and trusted
> resoluton)
> 
> 3) XRI Metadata
> 
> 4) XRI Primer
> 
>  
> 
> Which way are folks leaning?
> 
>  
> 
> =Drummond 
> 
>  
> 
>                                    
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:] 
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 6:33 PM
> To: Drummond Reed; 
> Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Trusted Resolution
> 
> 
>  
> 
> It's possible that my notes are wrong, but I show that the decision
> was to keep things the way they are - standard resolution as part of
> the core spec and trusted resolution as a separate spec.
> 
> 
>  
> 
>                                    
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:]
> Sent: Fri 11/12/2004 4:33 PM
> To: 
> Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Trusted Resolution
> 
> 
> I thought we decided to look at folding Trusted Res into a separate
> XRI
> Resolution spec starting in 2.0 (but just not to break it into a
> separate
> doc until the draft was further along).
> 
> =Drummond
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 11:56 AM
> To: Wachob, Gabe; 
> Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Trusted Resolution
> 
> Yes, I'm mostly waiting for review and feedback at this point.
> 
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:]
> > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 11:53 AM
> > To: 
> > Subject: [xri-editors] Trusted Resolution
> >
> > While we decided to keep trusted resolution as a separate
> specification,
> > possibly for incoporation into the main spec in the near future, do
> we
> > have plans to move the trusted resolution specification forward?
> >
> > I'm mostly looking in Dave's direction on this one..
> >
> >       -Gabe
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > 
> > Chief Systems Architect
> > Technology Strategies and Standards
> > Visa International
> > Phone: +1.650.432.3696   Fax: +1.650.554.6817
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> roster
> of
> > the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-
> > editors/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
> of the
> OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-editors/members/leave_workg
> roup.php.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
> of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-editors/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> 
>
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →