Hmm cool post.. First text I read about actual applications of 2.0 resolution.
- I think according to the specification it's not really true that in XRI resolution you must always have a CanonicalID on the XRD level, but for the purpose of blogging about this topic it's probably better to say it the way you did :)
- Did you mean to say that CIDs are "non-reasonable" identifiers, or is that supposed to say "non-reassignable"?
- The idea of using the SEP LocalID for OpenID delegation is great.. I think right now implementations use <openid:Delegate>, but <LocalID> sounds much more reasonable.
- It would also be interesting to consider how EquivID and CanonicalIDEquiv would fit into this scenario.
Markus
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:59 PM, John Bradley <> wrote:
As promised the blog post on LocalID and CanonicalID in openID
http://thread-safe.livejournal.com/9422.html
=jbradley
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
