Why would you ever want to put a company into the context of an
individual (what does = mean??). To me it makes
sense only the other way round, i.e. @microsoft.com=drummond.
And something that never appears anywhere can hardly confuse people, or? :)
Markus
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:25 PM, John Bradley <> wrote:
> I spent some time on the phone yesterday with Steve Churchill reviewing the
> proposal on GCS symbols in XRI 3.0.
>
> He reminded me that one of the original objections was allowing:
> =
> http://xri.net/[email protected]
>
> This in 2.0 would be represented as:
> =drummond*(@microsoft.com)
> http://xri.net/=drummond*(@microsoft.com)
>
> In removing the need for parenthesizing cross-references we run the risk of
> people misconstruing direct concatenated XRI as email addresses or otherwise
> trying to read the first XRI segment from right to left.
>
> The problem is alleviated slightly by having the XRI bound to a scheme.
>
> This is a social engineering problem rather than a actual resolution issue.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> John B.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
