I prefer the relation name to be more explicit, like 'see-also'. The proposed prefix looks good.
EHL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Norris [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:38 AM
> To: XRI TC
> Subject: [xri] thoughts on linked XRD rel value
>
> I believe it was generally agreed upon that we need to come up with a
> new rel value for linked XRDs. Here's some of my thoughts on that...
>
>
> Do we simply reuse the XRD XML namespace[0]? I'm thinking no... it's
> just bad practice, and we may eventually need to define other rel
> values in the spec (not likely, but still).
>
> The OASIS guidelines for URI design[1] dictate that URIs (other than
> XML namespaces) should start with "http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/".
> I'm figuring we'll need to add an "xrd" path segment under that, as
> well as a "rel" (or "relation") segment. There's no need to version
> these values as far as I know. So I'm thinking of something along the
> lines of (in no particular order):
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/rel/xrd
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/rel/linked
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/rel/linked-xrd
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/rel/equivalent
>
> Any thoughts on this? Suggestions for alternate rel values we could
> tack onto the end there? +/- 1 on any of the above URIs?
>
> Thanks,
> will
>
>
> [0]: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/xri/xrd-1.0
> [1]: http://docs.oasis-
> open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/resourceNaming.html#URI-Design
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
