Title: Re: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16
I like <Subject set="prefix"> beter than <SubjectPrefix> ...
Also, "prefix" does not seem to be a right terminology here for me
because it is not a prefix but is a part of the string.
Perhaps "forwardmatch" or "substr" etc. ?
=nat
Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Thanks. Then my <SubjectPrefix>
proposal stands.
EHL
On 7/21/09 11:32 AM, "Scott Cantor" <> wrote:
Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-07-21:
> So... I have a question to the security folks: since we don't
really need
a
> Subject for host-meta, only a place to stick the trust subject,
can we
just
> have a Subject-less document with an XRD-level <ds:KeyInfo>?
But it does
> require being able to put the hostname, port number, and protocol
details
> inside the ds:KeyInfo element which I am not sure is possible.
It's not possible semantically even it were made true syntactically via
an
extension.
-- Scott
