if all they did was add an element, that didn't break backward compatibility. The changes we are making with <Link> most certainly are breaking changes. (Not that I'm trying to change the namespace here... I'm *really* hoping we don't have to)
-will
On Dec 22, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> I am guessing that was needed when XRDS was a CD for a very long time and OpenID 2.0 needed to reference something stable. Either way, when XRDS Resolution 2.0 changed the schema from CD2 to CD3, they added <Type> at the XRD level but did not change the namespace.
>
> EHL
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:22 PM
>> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; 'Will Norris'; 'XRI TC'
>> Subject: RE: [xri] namespace URI versioning policy
>>
>> Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-12-22:
>>> That sounds highly unlikely.
>>
>> I thought so too, but the policy (which is strictly an XRI TC document, not an
>> OASIS thing), does say CD counts, pretty clearly.
>>
>> Presumably the TC can vote to supersede its own policy. I guess the
>> reasoning was to allow people to implement to CD "safely".
>>
>> -- Scott
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
