Okay, after thinking about it a bit, I realized that I was confusing the
XRD 1.0 spec with the XRI Resolution 2.0 spec on grounds of what SHOULD or
SHOULD NOT be done. The two are different types of specs.
I agree (again :) that something as simple as, "The document is no longer
valid after the date in <Expires>" WOULD work.
Nika
>
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Nika Jones wrote:
>
>> I'm in agreement with the discussion on the Expires element being a
>> superset of validity, with some somewhat strong language stating that it
>> should not be ignored.
>
> Well I think that's actually the question. Is it enough to say that a
> document is "no longer valid" after the date indicated in <Expires>?
> Scott seems to think so, and I'm inclined to agree.
>
> What does it mean to say that it "should not be ignored", as you indicate
> above? Unless we're actually going to instruct implementations as to what
> they SHOULD or MUST do with an expired XRD document, and I'm not sure that
> we should do that.
>
> -will
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
