RE: [cam] Default Namespaces

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Martin,

I think this demands a different approach - because we obviously
cannot be adding in namespaces when the content does not have
them.

What about adding something to the <properties> section - where
you could either filter a prefix in or out?

Basically the prefix is only there to fool the way the parsing code
has been written - so I HATE to make this the way it works.

Really - long term - that code should be fixed.  But in the shortterm
you could pre-parse each input line before it gets to the XML
parser and massage it.

Nothing is pretty here.   Misuse of namespaces are just killing.

Thoughts?

Thanks, DW.
========================================================
Message text written by INTERNET:martin.me.roberts@bt.com
>
        So if you look at the examples I sent you will see that the CAM
template has the namespace for the bod associated with the prefix bod.
The xml file that conforms to that template does not require a prefix as
CAM will match via the namespace uri not the prefix.

<