[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (CAMP-175) Could remove "artifacts" or make them optional
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Anish Karmarkar updated CAMP-175:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Alex Heneveld
> Could remove "artifacts" or make them optional
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMP-175
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-175
> Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Spec
> Affects Versions: 1.2
> Reporter: Alex Heneveld
> Assignee: Alex Heneveld
> Priority: Minor
>
> Some people we've talked to find the "artifacts" entry point for the plan confusing. Personally I like it and IMHO it *should* become the standard way to do things.
> But right now people mostly seem to be building things up and so the "services" entry point is preferred -- look at how docker/fig/compose do it, and cloud foundry, and apache brooklyn.
> To simplify we could remove all mention of "artifacts" or make them optional.
> Or not ... this is just something to be aware of.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]