conformance — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [conformance] new version Conformance Requirements Document
Thank you for the comment. It is helpful for targeting the editorial clean-up. I realize that there is additional clean-up that needs to be done, including ensuring that all references are cited correctly and fully, fix typos, check consistency and appropriateness of word usage (affect vs effect, capitalize or no capitalize, typos, etc)
Lynne
At 06:27 PM 3/5/02, Lofton Henderson wrote:
Here are a couple of minor editorials that need fixing:
misspelling, SAHLL
misspelling, REOMMENDED
line 404: this is the only place where MUST is used instead of SHALL (other than in the normative definitions themselves).
-Lofton.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]