cti-interoperability — archive

possible work item

From: Jerome Athias <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:07:00 -0000

I concur Btw I would expect to have some representatives of these efforts already on this mailinglist. ? Otherwise we should invite them On Tuesday, 27 October 2015, Davidson II, Mark S < [email protected] > wrote: My personal preference would be to work with them to all use the same thing vs. having some form of mapping across them. To me, this means that we would need to be open to accepting ideas from e.g., ThreatExchange and OpenTPX (Note: I’ve taken a quick look and I think there are good things to learn from both). I’ve said this privately to some already: I think ThreatExchange, OpenTPX, et al should be treated as allies in solving the problem of information sharing. Thank you. -Mark From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jason Keirstead Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 4:32 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Davidson II, Mark S < [email protected] > Subject: Re: RE: [cti-interoperability] possible work item It might help to get you 50% of the way, but the other 50% is the much longer pole. - Jason Keirstead Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems www.ibm.com/security www.securityintelligence.com Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown