cti-interoperability — archive

possible work item

From: Chet Ensign <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:19:00 -0000

Hi folks - Please don't mind OASIS staff butting into your conversation but I thought, given the topic, you might want to know that OASIS makes it very easy for Technical Committees to set up liaisons with groups outside OASIS. The details are in the Liaison Policy section on TC liaisons here -> https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/liaison#liaisons In a nutshell though, the process is: (a) identify a member of the TC who will act as the liaison. Usually this is someone who is a member of both organizations. (b) Approve that person as liaison by a motion in a TC meeting or by an electronic ballot. (c) Notify the OASIS President (Laurent - and cc me). (d) Post the person's name and liaison organization on the TC's web page. Then that person (or persons) can act as intermediary between the two organizations to keep each other apprised of one another's work, help identify related content, etc. etc. If you have any questions on this, just let me know. This could be a positive step towards achieving the positive relationship you envison. Best, /chet On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Kirillov, Ivan A. < [email protected] > wrote: Jason Lewis from Looking Glass and perhaps some other OpenTPX folks are on the list, but I don’t believe there is anyone from Facebook. IMO, given that we’re working towards creating an OASIS standard, the onus is on them to come participate in the discussions and share their ideas. Regards, Ivan From: < [email protected] > on behalf of Jerome Athias Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM To: Mark Davidson Cc: Jason Keirstead, " [email protected] ", Bret Jordan, " [email protected] " Subject: Re: [cti-interoperability] possible work item I concur Btw I would expect to have some representatives of these efforts already on this mailinglist. ? Otherwise we should invite them On Tuesday, 27 October 2015, Davidson II, Mark S < [email protected] > wrote: My personal preference would be to work with them to all use the same thing vs. having some form of mapping across them. To me, this means that we would need to be open to accepting ideas from e.g., ThreatExchange and OpenTPX (Note: I’ve taken a quick look and I think there are good things to learn from both). I’ve said this privately to some already: I think ThreatExchange, OpenTPX, et al should be treated as allies in solving the problem of information sharing. Thank you. -Mark From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jason Keirstead Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 4:32 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Davidson II, Mark S < [email protected] > Subject: Re: RE: [cti-interoperability] possible work item It might help to get you 50% of the way, but the other 50% is the much longer pole. - Jason Keirstead Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems www.ibm.com/security www.securityintelligence.com Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown